Thursday, 13 January 2011

Beaten for Pace

This week has brought the return to international cricket of Brett Lee and the retirement of Makhaya Ntini.  (See the excellent Guardian piece on Ntini on this link).  So it's right that Fantasy Bob should spill a little ink on pace bowling.

Makhaya Ntini
mobbed by fans at his farewell 20-20
Fantasy Bob’s readers will probably have worked out that it is extremely unlikely that FB has faced extreme pace in his long but undistinguished cricketing career.  FB may well retort that it all seemed bloody fast at the time, but there is fast and there is FAST.  FB once cranked the bowling machine at Carlton up to over 85mph which was an amusing experience - more for those watching than for FB himself. 
But FB will accept that this is a poor substitute for facing the speed kings on a bouncy wicket not having much of a clue as to what the length or line of the next bullet is going to be.  He has nothing but admiration for any batter who can withstand this onslaught, and appear to consider different possible shots as the ball screams towards him.  The fact that physicist assure FB that the ball is getting slower on its way down the wicket is no comfort.

FB has thrilled as a spectator to a few of the great fast men of our time.  Brett Lee against Scotland in 2009 was poetry in motion.  Akhtar, Younis, Akram and Holding have also had the privilege of being watched by FB.   From the boundary the athleticism,  the control and the use of the whole body’s energy in the delivery is remarkable and evident in a way that doesn't come across on TV.    The run is of course part of the intimidation of the batter and can be pure theatre.  Truly thrilling to watch.  Goodness knows what it is like from the business end.

So who is the greatest of the fast men?  Who is the one that FB would least like to have faced?  Here are some stats of the recent greats and some not so recent for comparison's sake.  In random order.



Tests
Wickets
Average
5w
Ambrose
98
405
20.99
22
Marshall
81
376
20.94
22
Waqar
87
373
23.56
22
Ahktar
46
178
25.69
12
Lillee
73
355
23.92
23
Willis
90
325
25.20
16
Akram
104
414
23.62
25
Larwood
21
78
28.35
4
Holding
60
249
23.68
13
Trueman
67
307
21.57
17
Thomson
51
200
28.00
8
McGrath
124
563
21.64
29
Hadlee
86
431
22.29
36
Donald
72
330
22.25
20
Snow
49
202
26.66
6
Tyson
17
76
18.56
4



Curtly talk to no man

Typhoon Tyson
 Tyson is reckoned by many to be the fastest of all.  He made his first class debut against the Indian tourists in 1953, after his first ball the slips moved back an extra five yards.  In 1954 at Old Trafford, Tyson hit the sightscreen on the first bounce. He is one of only four bowlers to have achieved this feat in the history of the game.  Jeff Thomson is another.  Presumably these days that accomplishment would be scored as 7 wides.  (Oops wrong there FB - see valuable correction in comments below - 5 wides)

Tyson claimed that he could bowl at 119 mph. Who knows? 


Frankly, FB would not have relished facing any of them.  Although Marshall shaves it in terms of average and probably had more variation about his bowling, FB thinks he would have been least happy about having to face Curtly Ambrose.  His bowling had a meanness about it that marked him out from the others.  Not only has he the best economy rate of all the fast men, he didn't do verbals - the caption above is his response to an interview request.  Hush was his intimidation.


Mean?  Don't take FB's word for it - ask Michael Atherton.  Dismissed 17 times by Ambrose in his career.  Ask Shane Warne, who ranked him 3 in his list of the 50 greatest cricketers.  Curtly Ambrose - stuff of nightmares.

4 comments:

  1. Pedant's time: a ball passing over the boundary having bounced once would be 5 wides (assuming it was wide when it passed the wicket - if not it would be 4 byes). A six can only be scored if the ball is struck by the bat (see law 19.5.b). In tyson's day, it would have been scored 4 wides or 4 byes. Not a lot of difference.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Many thanks. FB stands corrected.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Akhtar has picked 178 Test wickets,not 242.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ganesh - many thanks - FB is humiliated he read off from the wrong column - 242 is the Express's ODI tally. Figure now corrected.

    ReplyDelete