The batsman at the centre of the not-walking controversy has clarified some aspects of his controversial stay at the crease.
The suggestion that he nicked off while essaying an expansive drive at a full length ball must, he suggests, be discounted because in making the drive he was testing his eyesight.
He also suggested that in not walking he acted reasonably in exceptional circumstances. It was a complicated tricky situation. He wasn't yet off the mark.
WITTERINGS - CRICKET, LIFE AND ALL THAT OTHER STUFF
No comments:
Post a Comment