data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e7ef/4e7ef56a797d4b299cd46d4cd4978501378900db" alt=""
'Which requires more skill - returning a 150mph John Isner serve in tennis or defending a 95mph Dale Steyn delivery in cricket?'
As FB perused the answers offered by fellow readers, his brain began to race - if not to 150mph then pretty near 15mph. Why is not exactly clear - for FB's chances of seeing either delivery would be zero.
It reminded him of a tale he heard a long time ago - he has no idea as to whether it is apocryphal or not. So in the contemporary spirit of fake news he retells it here.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df51c/df51cfb7f180bcc8ce0b1dc1e5cd25040b64a6bd" alt=""
FB is sure that he has been victim to this rouse a number of times, only the perpetrators have not confessed to their deception.
But to return to the question put. A respondent noted that a tennis ball slows down significantly faster than a cricket ball (something to do with mass) - added to which the distance between the server and returner is significantly greater than between bowler and batter. That did it for FB - it was conclusive - he still wouldn't see either.
But he noted with interest the fact that the ball slows as it approaches the batter. This is not FB's experience at the crease. Invariably the ball speeds up as it approaches him - and in the case of 11 year old leg spinners the increase in speed is exponential. There is only explanation - a special zone of magnetic attraction around FB where the laws of physics are reversed. So here is a question for the clever clog readers of the Guardian - Is FB a black hole?